Another inconsequential post on SFist, this time about the rumored video iPod with a bigger screen that, like me, is touch sensitive.
And still I can’t work up much of a reaction other than “meh.” Either I’m getting more mature (plastic guitars notwithstanding) or I’ve just reached consumer electronics saturation what with all the handheld videogame players and MP3 players and phones and such. They don’t seem all that impressive anymore. Now, when they come out with one that plays video and more MP3s than will fit on a memory stick and gives directions and keeps notes and works as a phone, then get back to me. That’s what I’m missing from the Treo — it was kind of a lousy phone, but I liked always having access to maps and a notepad.
In other news, the Microsoft guy is saying that the Xbox 360 shortage is coming to an end within the next “four to six weeks,” and they’ll be readily available. Much to the dismay of ebay price-gougers. And me, since the news (along with the speculation that the PS3 won’t be out until September) re-sparked my interest in the damn thing. I still don’t play console games that often anymore (plastic guitars notwithstanding) and nothing’s really changed to make me want one. I can only guess it’s a subconscious reaction to a story I read a couple of days ago about this group of rabid recyclers who were pledging to buy nothing new in 2006 except for food and medical necessities. The thought of going a whole year without buying things I don’t need fills me with horror and dread.
Which reminds me: what I do need is a new camera. I’ve been to four conventions and other indoor-type events now, and half the pictures I get are worthless because they’re too dark and/or blurry. Either this camera sucks, or I’m developing Parkinsons Disease. Even the ones I take in daylight come out either too grainy or the colors are a lot more muted than I’d like to see. I realize that there are ISO and shutter-speed settings I could use to account for it, but my last camera (same Sony Cybershot line, just lower resolution) worked perfectly as a point-and-click. It was hard to take a bad picture with that one, and it was smaller and a lot more convenient.
If anybody has digital camera recommendations, I’d like to hear them.
My only recommendation is to be sure to get one that has a viewfinder. Sure, you’ll probably never actually use it, but the second you get a camera that doesn’t have one, you’ll suddenly NEED to use it. (Also, I’ve found myself using the viewfinder more recently because it helps to steady the camera, and thus reduce the blurry.)
A Nikon D70. That’s what you want
Have you tried using a pinhole camera? I learned about it in scouts.
I could never actually get it to work, but I think it had something to do with a shoebox and a mirror. And being clever.
Yeah, funny, Seppo, but I’m still saving up for that Ford GT you recommended and can’t quite afford to drop a thousand bucks on a camera. Plus I want something that I can carry around without its being too heavy and without my being terrified I’m going to drop it or lose it.
forget it – I reckon that creature looks far better as a blur