<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Spectre Collie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spectrecollie.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com</link>
	<description>Chuck Jordan&#039;s Personal Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:06:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychic Powers Activate by Tjibbbe</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/psychic-powers-activate/comment-page-1/#comment-15271</link>
		<dc:creator>Tjibbbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1741#comment-15271</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry about posting twice about the same subject, but I watched that Giantbomb quicklook, and man, this is lightyears above anything I expected, and I thought I had pretty high expectations! The look and feel of it is just about perfect. I love that, instead of simply moving away from the office and the street, you just decided to make it better. The way New York feels now is pretty amazing, it&#039;s got the grimy feel and detail from the comics I never thought would be possible in a game. I&#039;ll stop now, because maybe this isn&#039;t the place for this, but yeah, congratulations man. Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry about posting twice about the same subject, but I watched that Giantbomb quicklook, and man, this is lightyears above anything I expected, and I thought I had pretty high expectations! The look and feel of it is just about perfect. I love that, instead of simply moving away from the office and the street, you just decided to make it better. The way New York feels now is pretty amazing, it&#8217;s got the grimy feel and detail from the comics I never thought would be possible in a game. I&#8217;ll stop now, because maybe this isn&#8217;t the place for this, but yeah, congratulations man. Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychic Powers Activate by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/psychic-powers-activate/comment-page-1/#comment-15270</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1741#comment-15270</guid>
		<description>Actually, that&#039;s not the case. Mike Stemmle&#039;s writing two episodes (working with Joe Pinney on the design), Andy Hartzell is writing and designing one, and I&#039;m writing two of them. My title is something like &quot;season designer&quot; which means coming up with the overall story arc and making sure the key story beats are hit in each episode, but the episodes themselves are more the work of the individual designer/writer/director.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that&#8217;s not the case. Mike Stemmle&#8217;s writing two episodes (working with Joe Pinney on the design), Andy Hartzell is writing and designing one, and I&#8217;m writing two of them. My title is something like &#8220;season designer&#8221; which means coming up with the overall story arc and making sure the key story beats are hit in each episode, but the episodes themselves are more the work of the individual designer/writer/director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychic Powers Activate by Lena_P</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/psychic-powers-activate/comment-page-1/#comment-15269</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena_P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1741#comment-15269</guid>
		<description>Going by the fake movie poster at the Season 3 webpage, I&#039;d say the answer is &quot;yes&quot;, and as we all know fake movie posters never lie.  Chuck is writing, designing and directing, although I hear his real interest is QA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going by the fake movie poster at the Season 3 webpage, I&#8217;d say the answer is &#8220;yes&#8221;, and as we all know fake movie posters never lie.  Chuck is writing, designing and directing, although I hear his real interest is QA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychic Powers Activate by Tjibbbe</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/psychic-powers-activate/comment-page-1/#comment-15268</link>
		<dc:creator>Tjibbbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1741#comment-15268</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, the game looks amazing! I can&#039;t wait to play it. Maybe it&#039;s too early to ask something like this, but you are the lead writer on the first episode (and the entire season), right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, the game looks amazing! I can&#8217;t wait to play it. Maybe it&#8217;s too early to ask something like this, but you are the lead writer on the first episode (and the entire season), right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychic Powers Activate by Lena_P</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/psychic-powers-activate/comment-page-1/#comment-15267</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena_P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1741#comment-15267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but it needs to be said.  The Little Pharaoh and his molemen subjects are adorable.  I also love how General &quot;skunk ape&quot; is actually a baboon (although not nearly as evil or aggressive as a real baboon).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but it needs to be said.  The Little Pharaoh and his molemen subjects are adorable.  I also love how General &#8220;skunk ape&#8221; is actually a baboon (although not nearly as evil or aggressive as a real baboon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not A Dream! Not An Imaginary Story! by Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/not-a-dream-not-an-imaginary-story/comment-page-1/#comment-15266</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1739#comment-15266</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sad to admit that I agree, but happy to rant a bit with you.  I&#039;ve loved the show since the beginning (and I also refuse to be fanatical about it, since none of the peripheral or ARG content can matter, or it would be included in the episodes).  But, in spite of all the unanswered questions, it always seemed to make some kind of forward progress every week.  And, more importantly, each episode was interesting on its own merits, even if you didn&#039;t understand all of it.  

But, once they started jumping around in time and turning giant wheels to &quot;move&quot; the island last season, I think the show time-shifted the shark.  Or at least it started getting a bit silly.  However, this season I find myself longing for silly, as they promised answers, yet deliver more confusion than ever.  

I think I&#039;ve reached my breaking point, and expected dots to get connected.  Instead, they&#039;re introducing new characters left and right, none of whom seem to be the missing puzzle pieces I&#039;ve been waiting for.  Meanwhile, the whole parallel timeline thing should not have gone more than 1-2 episodes before revealing it&#039;s purpose--I just can&#039;t care what alternate versions of the characters did until you tell me that it has something to do with all the other crap you haven&#039;t explained yet!!  

Plus, the whole Jacob and evil Locke thing already feels like a cop-out, since they haven&#039;t really been characters in the show I&#039;ve been watching anyway.  It feels almost like an Agathie Christie murder story where 6 people are in a locked room, the lights go out, and someone is murdered--the killer must be one of the remaining 5!  Except, no, it was actually some guy from next door who you&#039;ve never heard of, and he snuck over and did it. Well, I&#039;m sorry, but that&#039;s not how good storytelling works. 

You can&#039;t have Jacob behind everything if I&#039;ve never even seen him before until the end of last season.  And, throwing in some flashbacks after the fact of him being at critical points in the story doesn&#039;t fix that.  Even worse is the evil Locke character.  Just because he inherited the body of one of your previous characters, doesn&#039;t mean you can get away without explaining him.  It&#039;s time for some answers!

Of course, I&#039;ll stick with the show to the bitter end.  After 5 years, I gotta see what they do with it.  But, I seriously don&#039;t see how they can answer even a fraction of all the questions.  And I&#039;m already not liking the glimpses of answers we&#039;ve gotten.  I think Fonzie is turning the waterski boat around to make another pass by the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sad to admit that I agree, but happy to rant a bit with you.  I&#8217;ve loved the show since the beginning (and I also refuse to be fanatical about it, since none of the peripheral or ARG content can matter, or it would be included in the episodes).  But, in spite of all the unanswered questions, it always seemed to make some kind of forward progress every week.  And, more importantly, each episode was interesting on its own merits, even if you didn&#8217;t understand all of it.  </p>
<p>But, once they started jumping around in time and turning giant wheels to &#8220;move&#8221; the island last season, I think the show time-shifted the shark.  Or at least it started getting a bit silly.  However, this season I find myself longing for silly, as they promised answers, yet deliver more confusion than ever.  </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve reached my breaking point, and expected dots to get connected.  Instead, they&#8217;re introducing new characters left and right, none of whom seem to be the missing puzzle pieces I&#8217;ve been waiting for.  Meanwhile, the whole parallel timeline thing should not have gone more than 1-2 episodes before revealing it&#8217;s purpose&#8211;I just can&#8217;t care what alternate versions of the characters did until you tell me that it has something to do with all the other crap you haven&#8217;t explained yet!!  </p>
<p>Plus, the whole Jacob and evil Locke thing already feels like a cop-out, since they haven&#8217;t really been characters in the show I&#8217;ve been watching anyway.  It feels almost like an Agathie Christie murder story where 6 people are in a locked room, the lights go out, and someone is murdered&#8211;the killer must be one of the remaining 5!  Except, no, it was actually some guy from next door who you&#8217;ve never heard of, and he snuck over and did it. Well, I&#8217;m sorry, but that&#8217;s not how good storytelling works. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t have Jacob behind everything if I&#8217;ve never even seen him before until the end of last season.  And, throwing in some flashbacks after the fact of him being at critical points in the story doesn&#8217;t fix that.  Even worse is the evil Locke character.  Just because he inherited the body of one of your previous characters, doesn&#8217;t mean you can get away without explaining him.  It&#8217;s time for some answers!</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;ll stick with the show to the bitter end.  After 5 years, I gotta see what they do with it.  But, I seriously don&#8217;t see how they can answer even a fraction of all the questions.  And I&#8217;m already not liking the glimpses of answers we&#8217;ve gotten.  I think Fonzie is turning the waterski boat around to make another pass by the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quite a Bit of Tsuris by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/quite-a-bit-of-tsuris/comment-page-1/#comment-15265</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1734#comment-15265</guid>
		<description>Oh. I&#039;m not buying that complaint at all; I think that&#039;s the worst type of IMDB &quot;Glitches &amp; Goofs&quot; type second-guessing. Why not just get one of the gangsters to shoot him, and dispense with Tommy altogether? Because Tommy has to be the one to do it, to prove his loyalty. And the goons wouldn&#039;t follow because then they&#039;d be witnesses. Even with the police corruption going on in that movie, you still don&#039;t send your hired goon to witness an execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. I&#8217;m not buying that complaint at all; I think that&#8217;s the worst type of IMDB &#8220;Glitches &#038; Goofs&#8221; type second-guessing. Why not just get one of the gangsters to shoot him, and dispense with Tommy altogether? Because Tommy has to be the one to do it, to prove his loyalty. And the goons wouldn&#8217;t follow because then they&#8217;d be witnesses. Even with the police corruption going on in that movie, you still don&#8217;t send your hired goon to witness an execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quite a Bit of Tsuris by Kroms</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/quite-a-bit-of-tsuris/comment-page-1/#comment-15263</link>
		<dc:creator>Kroms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1734#comment-15263</guid>
		<description>What I meant was, how come those two gangsters neither follow him nor double-check in the first place - when he&#039;s supposed to be executing Tommy? They do check later, which, if I remember correctly (it&#039;s been a while), sets-up the final act, but there&#039;s no particular reason they don&#039;t actually check &lt;i&gt;at the time&lt;/i&gt;. I Googled a bit, and apparently Ebert &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAOftHEeUjI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;had the same issue&lt;/a&gt; (YouTube video).

It&#039;s still a great movie, but that struck me as being an apathetic plot device. It diluted the quality a little for me, unfortunately.

(Sorry, my last post was horribly written.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I meant was, how come those two gangsters neither follow him nor double-check in the first place &#8211; when he&#8217;s supposed to be executing Tommy? They do check later, which, if I remember correctly (it&#8217;s been a while), sets-up the final act, but there&#8217;s no particular reason they don&#8217;t actually check <i>at the time</i>. I Googled a bit, and apparently Ebert <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAOftHEeUjI" rel="nofollow">had the same issue</a> (YouTube video).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a great movie, but that struck me as being an apathetic plot device. It diluted the quality a little for me, unfortunately.</p>
<p>(Sorry, my last post was horribly written.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quite a Bit of Tsuris by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/quite-a-bit-of-tsuris/comment-page-1/#comment-15262</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1734#comment-15262</guid>
		<description>Wait, I missed this before, @Kroms:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I love that movie, really, but there’s a small bit in the movie where Tom Reagan tricks a couple of gangsters into thinking he’d murdered the John Turturro character, and, for unfathomable reasons, the gangsters neither double check nor make sure that the deed’s been done. It’s a lazy plot device – or so I thought. Maybe you saw something I didn’t, or could just overlook it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m not sure I understand the question, because the &quot;small bit&quot; where Tommy tricks the gangsters is the pivotal scene of the movie! It&#039;s on the poster above my bed, and everything. And they do go back and check, in another extended sequence: Jon Polito&#039;s character forces the gangsters to take Tommy back to Miller&#039;s Crossing, and Tommy loses it and collapses and throws up (and loses his hat), but then they find a body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, I missed this before, @Kroms:</p>
<blockquote><p>I love that movie, really, but there’s a small bit in the movie where Tom Reagan tricks a couple of gangsters into thinking he’d murdered the John Turturro character, and, for unfathomable reasons, the gangsters neither double check nor make sure that the deed’s been done. It’s a lazy plot device – or so I thought. Maybe you saw something I didn’t, or could just overlook it?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand the question, because the &#8220;small bit&#8221; where Tommy tricks the gangsters is the pivotal scene of the movie! It&#8217;s on the poster above my bed, and everything. And they do go back and check, in another extended sequence: Jon Polito&#8217;s character forces the gangsters to take Tommy back to Miller&#8217;s Crossing, and Tommy loses it and collapses and throws up (and loses his hat), but then they find a body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quite a Bit of Tsuris by Rain</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2010/03/quite-a-bit-of-tsuris/comment-page-1/#comment-15261</link>
		<dc:creator>Rain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/?p=1734#comment-15261</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t like it much. But I&#039;ve found over the years, with the exception of &quot;Raising Arizona,&quot; that I have never liked a Coen brothers movie much on first viewing. But most of the time, if I see them again, I love &#039;em. It&#039;s just a matter of getting around to that second viewing that can sometimes be difficult. Like, I just have never wanted to sit through &quot;The Man Who Wasn&#039;t There&quot; again. Or &quot;Burn After Reading.&quot; But this one, this one I might give another try...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t like it much. But I&#8217;ve found over the years, with the exception of &#8220;Raising Arizona,&#8221; that I have never liked a Coen brothers movie much on first viewing. But most of the time, if I see them again, I love &#8216;em. It&#8217;s just a matter of getting around to that second viewing that can sometimes be difficult. Like, I just have never wanted to sit through &#8220;The Man Who Wasn&#8217;t There&#8221; again. Or &#8220;Burn After Reading.&#8221; But this one, this one I might give another try&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
