<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/</link>
	<description>Chuck Jordan's Personal Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12138</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12138</guid>
		<description>That's been on my to-do list, but I never cared enough about it to do anything about it. I guess now that somebody's mentioned it, I'll have to fix it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s been on my to-do list, but I never cared enough about it to do anything about it. I guess now that somebody&#8217;s mentioned it, I&#8217;ll have to fix it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rain</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12124</link>
		<dc:creator>Rain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12124</guid>
		<description>I don't know nothin' 'bout no fonts rendering, but could you put a link to the Spectre Collie homepage in the Spectre Collie logo? Yeah, I know there's a home link right under it, but I still prefer clicking on big-ass logos instead of medium-ass text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know nothin&#8217; &#8217;bout no fonts rendering, but could you put a link to the Spectre Collie homepage in the Spectre Collie logo? Yeah, I know there&#8217;s a home link right under it, but I still prefer clicking on big-ass logos instead of medium-ass text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12121</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12121</guid>
		<description>Of the two examples at that link, I prefer the top one (supposedly the blurry and amateurish one) 1000%.

And as for disregarding the OS UI conventions, I think the worst offense is that Apple doesn't put OK buttons in dialogs for their Windows apps; you're expected to just close it and accept that your changes "took," like they do on a Mac. On a Windows machine, that just feels weird.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Disclaimer: All hail Apple; Steve can do no wrong; Macs rule/PCs drool; yadda yadda ….&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Obviously, from the rest of this post, I only agree with 1 of those statements. Macs do rule, and PCs do, indeed, drool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the two examples at that link, I prefer the top one (supposedly the blurry and amateurish one) 1000%.</p>
<p>And as for disregarding the OS UI conventions, I think the worst offense is that Apple doesn&#8217;t put OK buttons in dialogs for their Windows apps; you&#8217;re expected to just close it and accept that your changes &#8220;took,&#8221; like they do on a Mac. On a Windows machine, that just feels weird.</p>
<blockquote><p>Disclaimer: All hail Apple; Steve can do no wrong; Macs rule/PCs drool; yadda yadda ….</p></blockquote>
<p>Obviously, from the rest of this post, I only agree with 1 of those statements. Macs do rule, and PCs do, indeed, drool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanford</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12118</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12118</guid>
		<description>" Text rendering on Windows machines looks like hairy, pimply ass."

You don't have to be mean about it. 

I prefer aliased text on body fonts -- for headlines and larger text I prefer anti-aliased; and for some reason anti-aliased fonts in Photoshop look great to me -- but I have always turned off text anti-aliasing in OS control panels. Call me weird; insult my design aesthetic if you must, but it's what I perfer. It may be that I have super-human vision, though. 

This is what bugged me about Safari (and IE7, for that matter): My OS has a control that lets me set my text rendering preference. However, Safari goes out of it's way to ignore that setting, and then go a step further and *not allow me to turn aliasing off*. Safari has three types of blurry: light, strong, and medium, which is condescendingly labeled "best for flat panel". I bet next that they're going to tell me that the $1.49 Mega Big Gulp is the "best value", too. 

Seriously, the anti-aliasing of small fonts on Safari makes the page rendering look blurry and amateurish to me. 

And this is not just me, there's more on the font issue here:  http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html

Disclaimer: All hail Apple; Steve can do no wrong; Macs rule/PCs drool; yadda yadda ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Text rendering on Windows machines looks like hairy, pimply ass.&#8221;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be mean about it. </p>
<p>I prefer aliased text on body fonts &#8212; for headlines and larger text I prefer anti-aliased; and for some reason anti-aliased fonts in Photoshop look great to me &#8212; but I have always turned off text anti-aliasing in OS control panels. Call me weird; insult my design aesthetic if you must, but it&#8217;s what I perfer. It may be that I have super-human vision, though. </p>
<p>This is what bugged me about Safari (and IE7, for that matter): My OS has a control that lets me set my text rendering preference. However, Safari goes out of it&#8217;s way to ignore that setting, and then go a step further and *not allow me to turn aliasing off*. Safari has three types of blurry: light, strong, and medium, which is condescendingly labeled &#8220;best for flat panel&#8221;. I bet next that they&#8217;re going to tell me that the $1.49 Mega Big Gulp is the &#8220;best value&#8221;, too. </p>
<p>Seriously, the anti-aliasing of small fonts on Safari makes the page rendering look blurry and amateurish to me. </p>
<p>And this is not just me, there&#8217;s more on the font issue here:  <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html</a></p>
<p>Disclaimer: All hail Apple; Steve can do no wrong; Macs rule/PCs drool; yadda yadda &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12102</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12102</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Funny, I always though the ugly text rendering was built into the Mac; I was shocked to see it looked just as bad, with no way to turn off anti-aliasing. Seriously, the different perspectives are interesting.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If by "the different perspectives are interesting," you mean "my opinion is completely in error" then yes, I agree with you. Text rendering on Windows machines looks like hairy, pimply ass. You &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; turn off the anti-aliasing in Windows Safari, though -- in the preferences window there's a "font smoothing" option. But gads, going from the text rendering in OS X to that of Windows is like going from an illuminated manuscript to an ImageWriter printout. I look at pages in Firefox under Windows and am confused because I didn't remember traveling to the past.

&lt;blockquote&gt;However, I actually think you’re not giving Apple enough credit here … the reason Safari is shipping for Windows, and the reason it renders pages just like the Mac version, is specifically for the iPhone.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sure, they do everything short of coming right out and saying that during the keynote. That doesn't change the fact that with the "no SDK required!" development plan for the iPhone, they're basically selling developers an empty box and then presenting slides bragging about how light the box is.

&lt;blockquote&gt;...so something is clearly screwed up with Apple apps and my Windows install. The Internet is not helpful at resolving this problem, and oddly enough, neither is uninstalling and reinstalling all of my Apple-created apps.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I haven't had any problems with Windows Safari so far, but it doesn't surprise me at all to hear other people are. The Apple apps for Windows look like they're doing stuff with the system it just plain doesn't &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to do.

Usually, I'm pedantic enough that it bugs me irrationally when developers break an OS's GUI conventions, but I give Apple a pass in this case if it means I get a web browser on Windows that doesn't make Mosaic look good in comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Funny, I always though the ugly text rendering was built into the Mac; I was shocked to see it looked just as bad, with no way to turn off anti-aliasing. Seriously, the different perspectives are interesting.</p></blockquote>
<p>If by &#8220;the different perspectives are interesting,&#8221; you mean &#8220;my opinion is completely in error&#8221; then yes, I agree with you. Text rendering on Windows machines looks like hairy, pimply ass. You <em>can</em> turn off the anti-aliasing in Windows Safari, though &#8212; in the preferences window there&#8217;s a &#8220;font smoothing&#8221; option. But gads, going from the text rendering in OS X to that of Windows is like going from an illuminated manuscript to an ImageWriter printout. I look at pages in Firefox under Windows and am confused because I didn&#8217;t remember traveling to the past.</p>
<blockquote><p>However, I actually think you’re not giving Apple enough credit here … the reason Safari is shipping for Windows, and the reason it renders pages just like the Mac version, is specifically for the iPhone.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, they do everything short of coming right out and saying that during the keynote. That doesn&#8217;t change the fact that with the &#8220;no SDK required!&#8221; development plan for the iPhone, they&#8217;re basically selling developers an empty box and then presenting slides bragging about how light the box is.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;so something is clearly screwed up with Apple apps and my Windows install. The Internet is not helpful at resolving this problem, and oddly enough, neither is uninstalling and reinstalling all of my Apple-created apps.</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had any problems with Windows Safari so far, but it doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all to hear other people are. The Apple apps for Windows look like they&#8217;re doing stuff with the system it just plain doesn&#8217;t <em>want</em> to do.</p>
<p>Usually, I&#8217;m pedantic enough that it bugs me irrationally when developers break an OS&#8217;s GUI conventions, but I give Apple a pass in this case if it means I get a web browser on Windows that doesn&#8217;t make Mosaic look good in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanford</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12101</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12101</guid>
		<description>Funny, I always though the ugly text rendering was built into the Mac; I was shocked to see it looked just as bad, with no way to turn off anti-aliasing. Seriously, the different perspectives are interesting. 

However, I actually think you're not giving Apple enough credit here ... the reason Safari is shipping for Windows, and the reason it renders pages just like the Mac version, is specifically &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt; the iPhone. So they can make sure people who will never, ever buy an iPhone can make their web pages look pretty on it. And make their Javascript actually work on it. 

Okay, I've spent most of my day blogging and commenting on this, and I don't even use my mac or ipod. back to work ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I always though the ugly text rendering was built into the Mac; I was shocked to see it looked just as bad, with no way to turn off anti-aliasing. Seriously, the different perspectives are interesting. </p>
<p>However, I actually think you&#8217;re not giving Apple enough credit here &#8230; the reason Safari is shipping for Windows, and the reason it renders pages just like the Mac version, is specifically <i>for</i> the iPhone. So they can make sure people who will never, ever buy an iPhone can make their web pages look pretty on it. And make their Javascript actually work on it. </p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve spent most of my day blogging and commenting on this, and I don&#8217;t even use my mac or ipod. back to work &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectrecollie.com/archives/2007/06/boom/#comment-12100</guid>
		<description>Windows Safari has been crashing on me on every attempted launch, before even displaying a window. Of course, QuickTime for Windows stopped working last week, saying "Error cannot load QuickTime ActiveX control," and iTunes for Windows currently, mysteriously, loads its installer/setup utility for 30 seconds with a progress bar saying something along the lines of "installing/configuring" before loading properly, every time I launch it, so something is clearly screwed up with Apple apps and my Windows install. The Internet is not helpful at resolving this problem, and oddly enough, neither is uninstalling and reinstalling all of my Apple-created apps. It's a bummer.

Glad Safari displays consistently across Mac and Windows. I am really really curious about this, because shitty browser-to-browser, OS-to-OS font support on the web is the bane of my professional existence, and I hope Apple really getting behind cross-platform browser consistency will maybe twist some arms (at least Mozilla's arms) in that regard as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Safari has been crashing on me on every attempted launch, before even displaying a window. Of course, QuickTime for Windows stopped working last week, saying &#8220;Error cannot load QuickTime ActiveX control,&#8221; and iTunes for Windows currently, mysteriously, loads its installer/setup utility for 30 seconds with a progress bar saying something along the lines of &#8220;installing/configuring&#8221; before loading properly, every time I launch it, so something is clearly screwed up with Apple apps and my Windows install. The Internet is not helpful at resolving this problem, and oddly enough, neither is uninstalling and reinstalling all of my Apple-created apps. It&#8217;s a bummer.</p>
<p>Glad Safari displays consistently across Mac and Windows. I am really really curious about this, because shitty browser-to-browser, OS-to-OS font support on the web is the bane of my professional existence, and I hope Apple really getting behind cross-platform browser consistency will maybe twist some arms (at least Mozilla&#8217;s arms) in that regard as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
